Method and apparatus for determining an appropriate link path in a multi-hop communication system

ABSTRACT

A determination of link quality (C SR ) is made from the subscriber station to a relay station. A determination of link quality (C RB ) is made from the relay station to the base station, and a determination of link quality (C SB ) is made from the subscriber station to the base station. A quality of a first link path from the subscriber station to the base station that passes through the relay station is determined based on at least the link qualities (Csr, Crb). A quality of a second link path from the subscriber station to the base station that does not pass through the relay station is determined based on at least the link quality (Csb). Finally, a determination is made whether to utilize the first link path or the second link path from the subscriber station to the base station based on at least the quality of the first and second link paths.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to multi-hop communicationsystems and in particular, to a method and apparatus for determining anappropriate link path in a multi-hop communication system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In cellular systems with an added multi-hop relay capability, such asthe communication system being developed under IEEE 802.16j, there is aneed to select whether to use a direct base station to subscriberstation transmission path or a relayed transmission path. Simpletechniques used to choose between the two do not take into account thecapacity lost by the activation of the base station to relay stationlink. For example, a particular subscriber station might have an RSSIfrom a relay station that is stronger than the RSSI from the direct basestation link. Based on RSSI alone, the subscriber station might thenrequest that the downlink path include a hop through the relay. However,this is basically a “greedy” approach which does not account for thechannel capacity lost in the transmission from the base station to therelay station.

Hence, there is a need to develop an efficient routing algorithm forselecting routes based on meaningful routing metrics and to define thesignaling necessary to perform routing operations.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates uplink and downlink communications within arelay-capable communication system.

FIG. 2 is a call flow diagram showing the exchange of messages between abase station, a relay station, and a subscriber station during downlinkhandoff of the subscriber station from the relay station to the basestation.

FIG. 3 is a call flow diagram showing the exchange of messages between abase station, a relay station, and a subscriber station during downlinkhandoff from the base station to the relay station.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a base station.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart showing the operation of the base station of FIG.4 when determining a best uplink path for a subscriber station.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing operation of the base station of FIG. 4when determining a best downlink path for a subscriber station.

FIG. 7. is a block diagram of a relay station.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart for RS messaging in accordance with one aspect ofthe invention.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart for BS messaging in accordance with one aspect ofthe invention.

FIG. 10 illustrates a case where more than one relay may be included inthe path between the base station and the subscriber station. It alsoillustrates an example where the link quality C_(BR) may be consideredas a composite link quality between the base station and all of therelays in a link path.

FIG. 11 illustrates a situation where there is more than one potentialcandidate relay for establishing the path between the base station andthe subscriber station.

FIG. 12 illustrates a case where more than one relay may be included inthe path between the base station and the subscriber station. It alsoillustrates an example where the link quality C_(RS) may be consideredas a composite link quality between all of the relays and the subscriberstation in a link path.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to address the above-mentioned need, an efficient routingalgorithm for selecting routes based on meaningful routing metrics isdescribed herein. In this application, a subscriber station is sometimesreferred to as an ‘SS’ or MS, a relay station as a ‘RS’, and a basestation as a ‘BS’ or a ‘BTS’. During operation, a determination of linkquality (C_(SR)) is made from the subscriber station to a relay station.Additionally, a determination of link quality (C_(RB)) is made from therelay station to the base station, and a determination of link quality(C_(SB)) is made from the subscriber station to the base station. Aquality of a first link path from the subscriber station to the basestation that passes through the relay station is determined based on atleast the link qualities (Csr, Crb) and a quality of a second link pathfrom the subscriber station to the base station that does not passthrough the relay station is determined based on at least the linkquality (Csb). Finally, a determination is made whether to utilize thefirst link path or the second link path from the subscriber station tothe base station based on at least the quality of the first and secondlink paths.

Some of the benefits that may be realized with some embodiments of theinvention include increased link data rate, increased range, increasedsystem capacity, backward compatibility with IEEE 802.16e mobiles,improved route selection, and independently optimized route selection onthe downlink and uplink (e.g., since the transmit power may be differenton the downlink and uplink).

Turning now to the drawings, wherein like numerals designate likecomponents, FIG. 1 illustrates uplink and downlink communications withinrelay-capable communication system 100. As shown in FIG. 1, there existtwo possible routes for the downlink and uplink in a system that allowsa maximum of one relay in the route between the base station and thesubscriber station. The one relay case is shown as an example, andgenerally the system may allow multiple relays in the route or pathbetween the base station and subscriber station. A route could alsoinclude two or more relays in parallel at some point in the path. Thecapacity, or possibly some other link metric, of each hop or link isrepresented by C_(xy), where x is the source of the hop and y is thedestination of the hop. Note that for the example of FIG. 1, x and y cantake on labels of B for the base station, R for the relay station, and Sfor the subscriber station.

For the case where the channel resources are dynamically divided betweenthe base station and the relay station (e.g., time division multiplexingon a common channel frequency), the net capacity of the base station torelay station to subscriber station path is given by

$C_{{BR} - {RS}} = \left( {\frac{1}{C_{BR}} + \frac{1}{C_{RS}}} \right)^{- 1}$

and the net capacity of the subscriber station to relay station to basestation path is given by:

$C_{{SR} - {RB}} = {\left( {\frac{1}{C_{SR}} + \frac{1}{C_{RB}}} \right)^{- 1}.}$

Therefore, the relay should not be included in the downlink path unless

C_(BR-RS)>C_(BS),

and the relay should not be included in the uplink path unless

C_(SR-RB)>C_(SB).

Note that these capacity values are achieved with optimal resourceallocation (e.g., optimal time sharing of the channel) for each of thetwo links. In practice, C_(BR-RS) can be much lower. For instance, ifthe duty cycle is 50% (i.e., the source and the relay are each allocated50% of the resources), the capacity is given by:

$C_{{SR} - {RB}} = {\frac{1}{2}{{\min \left( {C_{SR},C_{RB}} \right)}.}}$

A simple numerical example can be shown to explain why using only SNRsof the base to subscriber link and the relay to subscriber link is notoptimal: assume the following values for the SNRs of the various links(in dB):

-   -   base station to relay station: 14 dB with a Shannon capacity of        4.7 b/s/Hz; the quality of this link is ignored in conventional        subscriber-assisted routing    -   relay station to subscriber station: 10 dB with a Shannon        capacity of 3.46 b/s/Hz; and    -   base station to subscriber station: 6 dB with a Shannon capacity        of 2.3 b/s/Hz.

Using only SNR values as seen by the subscriber station, it seems tomake sense to use the relay on the downlink since the relay station tosubscriber station SNR is 4 dB higher than the base station tosubscriber station SNR. However, in terms of capacity, it is actuallybetter to use the direct base station to subscriber station link sincethe net capacity of the relayed link is 1.98 b/s/Hz, which is lower than2.3 b/s/Hz. Using the relay based on SNR would result in a 13% capacityloss. Note that with suboptimal resource allocation policies (e.g.,constrained resource partitioning), the capacity loss of RF-basedrouting decisions can be even larger. As a result, if SNR is used toassist with routing decisions, it should be converted into a metricwhich is more reflective of the link efficiency (e.g., data rate,capacity, modulation/coding rate, etc.), and the quality of the linkbetween the base station and relay station should additionally be takeninto account.

In order to address this issue, in the present invention a determinationof link quality (C_(SR)) is made from the subscriber station to a relaystation.

Additionally, a determination of link quality (C_(RB)) is made from therelay station to the base station, and a determination of link quality(C_(SB)) is made from the subscriber station to the base station. Aquality of a first link path from the subscriber station to the basestation that passes through the relay station is determined based on atleast the link qualities (Csr, Crb) and a quality of a second link pathfrom the subscriber station to the base station that does not passthrough the relay station is determined based on at least the linkquality (Csb). Finally, a determination is made whether to utilize thefirst link path or the second link path from the subscriber station tothe base station based on at least the quality of the first and secondlink paths. Determining the second link quality based on at least Csbmay further comprise using Csb directly as the link quality.

In an additional aspect of the invention, determination of link quality(C_(RS)) is made from the relay station to a subscriber station.Additionally, a determination of link quality (C_(BR)) is made from thebase station to the relay station, and a determination of link quality(C_(BS)) is made from the base station to the subscriber station. Aquality of a first link path from the base station to the subscriberstation that passes through the relay station is determined based on thelink qualities (C_(RS), C_(BR)) and a quality of a second link path fromthe base station to the subscriber station that does not pass throughthe relay station is determined based on the link quality (C_(BS)).

The decision whether to utilize the relay station in the forming thelink path from the subscriber station to the base station, and/or fromthe base station to the susbscriber station may be performed at the basestation or at the relay station. For example, the relay station couldcollect the necessary link qualities, and determine a recommended linkpath. The relay station could then forward the recommendation to thebase station, and the base station would make a final decision on thelink path.

The invention is also applicable to situations where multiple relaysexist. In this scenario, the step of determining the link quality(C_(RB)) from the relay station to the base station may comprise thestep of determining a link quality of a relay link path from the relaystation to the base station, wherein the relay station link path passesthrough at least an additional intermediate relay station.

C_(SR), C_(RB), C_(SB), C_(RS), C_(BR), or C_(BS) is preferably based onat least one of a data rate, a modulation-coding rate, anoverhead-adjusted modulation-coding rate, a modulation-coding index,overhead-adjusted modulation-coding index, a link capacity, or an SNR orSINR. (Note that the terms SNR, CNR, SINR, CINR will be usedinterchangeably). A brief explanation of each is now given:

-   -   Link quality based on modulation-coding rate—the        modulation-coding rate being used on a link, or the highest        modulation-coding rate that is expected to be supportable on a        link (e.g. based on channel quality, a frame error rate target,        and possibly bandwidth) provides an indication of link capacity        or efficiency, such as the number of information bits carried        per unit of channel resource. For example, a 16-QAM modulation        constellation has M=4 bits per symbol, and a channel coding        (e.g. convolutional, turbo, or other) rate of R=½ reduces the        information rate to ½ the value it would be without coding. So        in this example, if a link is using 16-QAM with R=½ coding (or        is expected to be able to support such a modulation and coding        combination), the resulting modulation-coding rate is MR=2        information bits per symbol. The modulation-coding rates could        be scaled, or represented in other units (e.g., b/s/Hz), or        represented in other ways, if desired.    -   Link quality based on an overhead-adjusted modulation-coding        rate—This metric is similar as the previous one, but the        overhead due to e.g., pilots or control information is accounted        for in the link quality metric: for instance, if the        modulation-coding-rate is 3 b/s/Hz and if the overhead is 20%,        the overhead-adjusted modulation-coding-rate is 3*0.8=2.4        b/s/Hz. An overhead-adjusted metric may also be referred to as a        net metric.    -   Link quality based on data rate—This metric provides an        indication of the current or expected data rate that is        achievable on a particular link. It may include or exclude        overhead. Preferably, it is known in advance whether overhead is        included or excluded.    -   Link quality based on a modulation-coding index—in some systems,        each supported combination of modulation and coding rate is        assigned an index. Since the relationship between        modulation-coding scheme and the index is known in advance, a        modulation-coding index can easily be converted into a more        direct link quality indicator, such as modulation-coding rate.        Overhead may be included or excluded when determining the index.        The index is sometimes referred to as an MCS.    -   Link quality based on a link capacity—Link capacity typically        means either the b/s or the b/s/Hz that is supportable on a        link. As such, it is quite similar to modulation-coding rate.        The capacity representation could represent either the capacity        of the data symbols, or it could be adjusted for the control and        pilot overheads (net capacity).    -   Link quality based on SNR/SINR—C_(xy) may be determined based on        SNR or SINR, such as by coverting an SNR of a link between x and        y to a link efficiency metric. One example of this is a modified        Shannon limit C_(xy)≈log₂(1+αSNR_(xy)), where α is a calibration        factor and SNR_(xy) is the SNR of the link between entity x and        entity y. The result can be adjusted for overhead as well. Other        methods for converting an SNR or SINR to a capacity, or link        efficiency, or date rate, or the like could also be used.

Other link quality metrics that may be useful include RSSI, path loss,and potentially others as well.

In addition, C_(SR/RS), C_(RB/BR), or C_(SB/BS) (where C_(xy/yz) meanseither C_(xy) or C_(yz)) may be related to a previously observed linkquality (e.g., on the previous frame) between the subscriber station andthe relay, the relay and the base station, or the subscriber station andthe base station, or may be related to an anticipated link quality(e.g., the value predicted for the next frame). The determination ofC_(SR), C_(RB), and similarly of C_(RS) and C_(BR) may include theimpact more than one relay (e.g., considering C_(SR), if there are tworelays in the path being evaluated in terms of link quality, then C_(SR)is the net or composite link quality originating at the subscriberstation and ending at the last relay in the path).

Consider now performing a routing decision for an IEEE 802.16esubscriber station deployed in an IEEE 802.16j system. As specified bythe IEEE 802.16j PAR, the underlying assumption is that, in an IEEE802.16j system, the air-interface on the subscriber station to basestation and subscriber station to relay station links remains the sameas in the IEEE 802.16e system. Specifically, every base station andrelay station transmits a unique preamble, which enables the initialchannel acquisition by the subscriber stations. Furthermore, the initialnetwork entry procedure for a subscriber station remains unchanged asspecified in the IEEE 802.16e standard. Following this network entryprocedure, a subscriber station admitted into the network will beconnected to the nearest base station or relay station, whichever isclosest. The nearest base station or relay station is determined basedon the measured strength of the preamble. From the subscriber stationside, it is impossible to distinguish between being connected to a relaystation or a base station (the subscriber station always assumes that itis connected to a base station in order to fully maintain backwardscompatibility with 802.16e).

Based primarily on this configuration, but not limited to thisconfiguration, the present invention provides for practical routingstrategies for handoff or link path (route) selection from relay stationto base station, and handoff or link path selection from base station torelay station, each of which can be decided independently between thedownlink and uplink if desired. In order to simplify the systemoperation, the base station may determine the path on the uplink andthen optionally use the same path for the base station to subscriberstation link (downlink). For convenience, it is assumed that the basestation performs centralized routing decisions in its cell and signalsthe routes to the relevant relay stations and subscriber stations. Inalternate embodiments, the relay station can independently collectinformation and initiate a handoff recommendation to the base stationrather than relying on the base station to initiate the handoff process,or the base station may instruct a relay station to collect some or allof the needed information.

In the present invention, mobility handoff messages defined in the IEEE802.16e are used in a new way—for signaling the routes to the subscriberstations and to define the necessary relay station to base stationmessages to ensure that handoff and routing operations can be seamlesslyperformed. In the TDD more of 802.16, the relay station, the basestation and the subscriber station can all communicate on a shared radiofrequency channel (e.g., a 5 MHz channel for an IEEE802.16e systemoperating with the OFDMA mode). Four cases need to be considered:

1. subscriber station linked to relay station, uplink

2. subscriber station linked to relay station, downlink

3. subscriber station linked to base station, downlink

4. subscriber station linked to base station, uplink

Note that the routes on the uplink and on the downlink may need to bedifferent for best performance: for instance, the downlink may be adirect base station to subscriber station link whereas the uplink couldbe routed through one or more relays. However, in order to simply thesystem operation at the cost of potentially reduced performance, it maybe decided to base the route determination for both the uplink anddownlink on the uplink path only or the downlink path only.

Case 1: Subscriber Station Linked to Relay Station, Downlink

The process is as follows and is illustrated in FIG. 2:

-   -   1. The base station requests the relay station to report C_(RS).        As described above, this can be represented as an MCS index or        another link quality metric. Since the subscriber station is        already connected to the relay station, the relay station would        normally already know this value based on the MCS used by the        relay station when transmitting to the subscriber station.        Alternatively, the SNR channel quality information (CQI)        feedback from the subscriber station could be used to derive a        C_(RS) estimate.    -   2. The base station requests the relay station to obtain and        report downlink Carrier to Interference Noise Ratio (CINR) of        base station to subscriber station link.        -   a. The relay station requests the subscriber station to            measure and report CINR_(BS), the CINR of the base station            to subscriber station link (alternatively, RSSI could be            used). This report is received by the relay station.        -   b. the relay station reports CINR_(BS) to the base station.    -   3. The base station computes C_(BR-RS) as a function of at least        C_(RS) and C_(BR). Note that C_(BR) may be known based on the        MCS used by the base station when transmitting to the relay        station, and C_(RS) was obtained in step 1.    -   4. The base station compares C_(BR-RS) and C_(BS) and makes the        determination whether to use the relay station. If        C_(BR-RS)<C_(BS), END. Else go to Step 5.    -   5. The base station requests relay station to initiate        subscriber station handoff (or a new link path) to the base        station.        -   a. the relay station initiates subscriber station handoff to            the base station.        -   b. the subscriber station acknowledges the handoff command.        -   c. the subscriber station ranges to the base station.

Relay Station Capacity Estimation Step

If the subscriber station is connected to the relay station, the relaystation can estimate C_(RS) based on the MCS used when transmitting tothe subscriber station, or alternatively based on Channel QualityInformation (CQI) feedback from the subscriber station. The base stationcan send a request to the relay station to measure and report C_(RS).The C_(RS) is then signaled back to the base station. The CQI estimatesobtained at the subscriber station are based on the pilot signaltransmitted by the relay station. The relay station pilot signal couldbe provided in a number of different ways. Specifically, the relaystation could be implemented as a complete base station, or the relaystation could transmit only the pilot signal and the downlink dataassigned to it. Also, the relay station could only transmit in aspecific downlink region of the frame for which the mobile could berequested to report CQI. Thus, the relay station may notify thesubscriber station of a channel resource upon which the relay stationmay receive a signal from the subscriber station to assist in measuringC_(SR). After receiving the notification, the subscriber station wouldreport the CQI for that particular resource.

Base Station Capacity Estimation Process

Estimation of C_(BS) represents the biggest challenge, as the subscriberstation is not directly communicating with the base station. However,existing 802.16e messages can be used in a new way to obtain a measureof the base station to subscriber station link quality at the relaystation. First, the base station requests the relay station to obtainCINR_(BS), the base station to subscriber station CINR. In order to doso, the relay station sends the subscriber station an IEEE 802.16MOB_SCN-RSP message or the like, where the neighbor list only containsthe base station BSID, and where it indicates the subscriber station toreport the CINR. In other words, the existing MOB_SCN-RSP message istailored to notify the subscriber station to report the base station tosubscriber station CINR. The subscriber station replies using the IEEE802.16 MOB_SCN-REP message or the like. At this stage, the relay stationknows CINR_(BS). It then reports it to the base station, which canestimate C_(BS) using, e.g., the modified Shannon model. Alternatively,MOB_SCN-RSP can be used to solicit RSSI information that could be usedfor capacity estimation (but SINR is preferred). Also, depending on theimplementation, the relay station could perform the conversion fromCINR_(BS) to C_(BS) and report C_(BS) rather than CINR_(BS). Yet, inanother alternative solution, the subscriber station could be requestedby the relay station to report CQI channel feedback for the basestation. For this scheme, signaling defined for the fast base stationswitching (FBSS) protocols in the IEEE 802.16e standard or the likecould be employed.

Routing Step

If the relay station and base station are at least occasionallymaintaining their communication link then the C_(BR) metric may alreadybe known at the base station. Upon obtaining estimates of, C_(RS) andC_(BS), the base station computes C_(BR-RS) and can compare it to C_(BS)to decide whether the subscriber station should handoff to the basestation or not. If no handoff is required, the procedure stops. Ifhandoff is required, the base station performs the Handoff Step.

Handoff (New Link Path) Process

If the subscriber station needs to handoff to the base station, the basestation preferably notifies the relay station to initiate the handoffprocess. The receipt of this message causes the relay station toinstruct the subscriber station to directly connect to the base station.This is accomplished by sending a message, such as MOB_BSHO-REQ or thelike to the subscriber station specifying the base station ID, and onlythis ID, in the recommended neighbor list, and also specifying that thisis a mandatory request. The subscriber station then proceeds with ahandover (HO) process to the base station, as specified in the IEEE802.16e standard. As part of the HO process, the subscriber stationacquires the downlink base station control channel and sends a rangingrequest to the base station on the uplink.

New Signaling Messages

In order to enable the above-described procedure, in one embodimenteight 802.16j specific messages are defined:

-   -   RS_CAP_DL-REQ: used by the base station to request relay station        to report C_(RS).    -   RS_CAP_DL-RSP: used by the relay station to report C_(RS).    -   RS_MEAS_SS-REQ: to notify the relay station to obtain CINR_(BS).    -   RS_MEAS_SS-RSP: used by the relay station to report CINR_(BS).    -   RS_HANDOFF_REPORT-REQ: This can be an alternative to        RS_CAP_DL-REQ and RS_MEAS_SS-REQ. It is a configurable message        that can specify to report either C_(RS) or CINR_(BS), or both.    -   RS_HANDOFF_REPORT-RSP: The response message from the relay        station containing the information requested by        RS_HANDOFF_REPORT-REQ.    -   RS_INITIATEHO-REQ: to have the relay station sending the handoff        command to the subscriber station.    -   RS_INITIATEHO-RSP: acknowledgment of the RS_INITIATEHO-REQ        message (optional, but probably desirable for robustness).

Note that these messages are exchanged between the base station and therelay station and are completely transparent to the subscriber station.Also note that the names of the messages are examples, and may bedifferent in an actual implementation.

The process is illustrated by the bounce diagram shown in FIG. 2. Moreparticularly, FIG. 2 is an example call flow diagram showing theexchange of messages between the base station, the relay station, andthe subscriber station during downlink link path determination/selectionor handoff of the subscriber station from the relay station to the basestation. As shown, in order to initiate a downlink handoff, the processbegins with the base station sending a RS_CAP_DL-REQ message to therelay station. As described above, the message causes the relay stationto report C_(RS) to the base station in a RS_CAP_DL-RSP message. Thebase station next transmits a RS_MEAS_SS-REQ message to the relaystation to notify the relay station to obtain CINR_(BS). The CINR_(BS)is obtained by the relay station transmitting a MOB_SCN-RSP message tothe subscriber station. This causes the subscriber station to measureCINR_(BS) and transmit this information to the relay station in the formof a MOB_SCN-REP message. CINR_(BS) is transmitted from the relay to thebase via the relay station transmits a RS_MEAS_SS-RSP message to thebase. In response, the base station transmits a RS_INITIATEHO-REQ to therelay station causing the relay station to send a handoff command(MOB_BSHO-REQ) to the subscriber station. The subscriber station replies(optionally) with a RS_INITIATEHO-RSP acknowledging the handoff istaking place. Finally, a ranging message is transmitted from thesubscriber station to the base station as part of the handoff procedure.

The process described above is a base station-initiated process.However, since the relay station already has all of the informationneeded by the process except for the CINR of base station to subscriberstation link, the relay station can request the subscriber station tomeasure and report C_(BS), or link quality necessary to compute C_(BS):the relay station could autonomously request CINR_(BS) reports from thesubscriber station (e.g., periodically, or when is C_(RS) low), forexample by using the MOB_SCN-RSP message. C_(BS) can also be obtained atthe relay station from the base station: the relay station couldinstruct the base station to request the subscriber station to measureand report C_(BS), by using for instance the MOB_SCN-RSP message. Thebase station could then forward C_(BS) (or link quality necessary tocompute C_(BS)) to the relay station. The relay station could thenprovide an unsolicited report to the base station with the gatheredinformation and a link path recommendation such as a recommendation toinitiate a handoff. Hence, the process can be relay station initiatedwhile still being ultimately controlled by the base station.Practically, this means that relay station_HANDOFF_REPORT-RSP or similarmessages can be send by the relay station to the base station in anunsolicited fashion. The relay station can then initiate the handoffprocess and instruct the subscriber station to utilize the base station,for instance by sending an IEEE 802.16-2005 MOB_BSHO-REQ message. Therelay station can also notify the base station of an imminentsusbscriber connection in order to improve the handoff reliability.

Case 2: Subscriber Station Linked to Relay Station, Uplink

The process for handoff of the uplink communication is as follows:

-   -   1. The base station requests the relay station to report C_(SR).    -   2. The base station measures C_(SB) and C_(RB).    -   3. The base station computes C_(SR-RB) as a function of at least        C_(SR) and C_(RB) and decides which link path to use.    -   4. The base station compares C_(SR-RB) and C_(SB) and makes the        determination of whether to use the relay station in the path        from the subscriber station to the relay station. If        C_(SR-RB)<C_(SB), END. Else go to Step 5.    -   5. The base station requests the relay station to initiate        subscriber station handoff to the base station.    -   6. The relay station initiates subscriber station handoff to the        base station.    -   7. The subscriber station acknowledges the handoff command.    -   8. The subscriber station ranges to base station.

The above process is actually quite similar as on the downlink. A majordifference is that that the base station requests the relay station toreport C_(SR): in order to enable this operation, the base station mayprovide to the relay station an indication of the subscriber station ID(Such as one of the subscriber station's CIDs) or may provide anindication of a channel resource upon which the relay may receive asignal from a subscriber station in order to assist in measuring thelink quality. Also, C_(SR) can be received from the susbscriber stationeither in a solicited or an unsolicited manner. Another difference isthat the base station can perform the C_(SB) measurement with a simplerprocess. There are three possibilities: (i) a centralized scheduler isutilized at the base station; (ii) decentralized schedulers are utilizedat the relay stations; (iii) a centralized scheduler is utilized at thebase station and map control information is multicast from the basestation and the relay stations.

For (i), a centralized scheduler, the base station is aware of the relaystation impending uplink transmissions and can utilize embedded uplinkpilots to estimate C_(SB). For (ii), with a decentralized schedulingalgorithm, the base station is informed of the impending subscriberstation transmission by the relay station that has scheduled thetransmission. For (iii), the base station and the relay stations areaware of the map control information by the nature of the multicastprocess. Note that these methods are based on the base station“sniffing” the uplink transmissions of the subscriber station to therelay station. In some cases of spatial reuse, the base station may needto leave a portion of its uplink resources unused to allow accurateestimation of the uplink subscriber station to base station SINR.

Note that in some embodiments, the base station and/or relay station maynot be aware of the transmit power used by the subscriber station, whichcan make determining the link quality C_(SB) and/or C_(SR) moredifficult. Therefore, the subscriber station may be requested to providean indication of its transmit power to the base station or the relaystation to assist in determining link quality and/or determining thelink path. If the relay station requests the subscriber station toreport its transmit power, then after receiving an indication (ormessage) containing the transmit power, the relay station can forwardthe transmit power information to the base station assist in determininglink quality and/or determining the link path. Knowing the transmitpower may enable the base station to determine path loss, or may enablethe base station to compensate for the fact that the subscriber stationmay be assigned a different transmit power on the different possiblelink paths, thus providing the capability to compensate for the impactof different transmit powers on the link qualities used for determiningthe link path. Such compensation may be performed on the link qualitiesthemselves, or could be included in the processing of the linkqualities. Also, in some embodiments, if the base station knows thesubscriber station transmit power, it may transmit this information tothe relay station to assist the relay station in determining the linkquality C_(SR).

The determination of C_(RB) is straightforward since there is anestablished link between the relay station and the base station. C_(RB)can be determined at least in part as a function on the modulation andcoding scheme or the modulation and coding rate used between the relaystation and the base station.

When determined that the subscriber station should establish a directpath with the base station (without using the relay station), the basestation sends an instruction to the relay station to initiate thehandoff. The relay station then sends an instruction to the base stationto handoff to the base station. In the context of the IEEE 802.16standard, this message can be a MOB_BSHO-REQ message.

Alternative Routing Step (Transparent Relaying)

In certain network configurations, it is possible to avoid the overheadof the HO procedure by performing transparent relaying. Specifically, ina system deployment with relatively small cell sizes and synchronizedbase station and relay station transmissions, a subscriber station thatis attached to the relay station is also roughly time-aligned with thebase station. In this case, the control channel data continues to berelayed through the relay station, whereas payload data can be directlytransmitted and received by the base station.

In order to enable this process, one embodiment provides two new IEEE802.16j specific messages:

-   -   RS_CAP_UL-REQ: used by the base station to request relay station        to report C_(SR).    -   RS_CAP_UL-RSP: used by the relay station to report C_(SR).

Additionally, for the decentralized scheduling case, a message is neededfor indicating the resource assignment of the subscriber station on theuplink:

-   -   SS_UL_RESOURCE_REPORT        Finally, as noted earlier, the relay station could also report        the information in an unsolicited fashion. Again, here and        throughout the description, the specific message names are only        examples—the functionality of the message is more important than        the name.

Alternatively, all the routing path decision can be made by the relaystation. The relay station may compare C_(SR-RB) and C_(SB) and make thedetermination whether to use the relay station. In that case, the relaystation may receive C_(SB) from the base station. Once the pathdetermination is done by the relay station, the relay station may send alink path recommendation to the base station. C_(RB) can be computed atthe relay station or sent by the base station to the subscriber station.Once the link path determination is done by the relay station, the relaystation may instruct the susbscriber station to connect to the basestation: in the IEEE 802.16-2005 context, this can be done by the relaystation sending a MOB_BSHO-RSP message to the subscriber station withthe base station ID. In order to improve the robustness of the handoffprocess, the relay may notify the base station of an imminent subscriberconnection.

Case 3: Subscriber Station Linked to Base Station, Downlink

In this scenario, the subscriber station is now linked to the basestation, and the option of having it routed via the relay is underconsideration. A simple method for this process is described below andis shown in FIG. 3. In particular, FIG. 3 is a call flow diagram showingthe exchange of messages between a base station, a relay station, and asubscriber station during downlink handoff from the base station to therelay station. During operation:

-   -   1. The base station requests the subscriber station to measure        and report downlink CINR of the relay station to subscriber        station link.    -   2. The base station computes C_(BR-RS) as a function of at least        C_(RS) and C_(BR) and decides which link path to use.    -   3. The base station compares C_(BR-RS) and C_(BS) and makes the        determination whether to use the relay station. If        C_(BR-RS)<C_(BS), END. Else go to Step 4.    -   4. The base station notifies the relay station of an imminent        subscriber station handoff.    -   5. The base station initiates subscriber station handoff to the        relay station.    -   6. The subscriber station acknowledges the handoff command.    -   7. The subscriber station ranges to relay station.

This process is quite similar with the one described for case 1, but thebase station can determine C_(BS) since there is a direct link betweenthe base station and the subscriber station. Since the base station andthe subscriber station exchange data, the base station can for exampledetermine what the maximum sustainable MCS is for a given target FER bycounting the ACK messages received from the subscriber station for anygiven MCR. Also, the subscriber station can send back CQI information tothe base station. However, the base station must obtain the CINR (orRSSI) of the relay station to subscriber station link in order toestimate C_(RS). The base station can evaluate C_(RS) with linkinformation sent by the subscriber station at the base station'srequest. In order to do so, the base station sends the subscriberstation a MOB_SCN-RSP message, where the neighbor list only contains therelay station BSID, and where it indicates the subscriber station toreport the CINR. In other words, the existing MOB_SCN-RSP message istailored to notify the subscriber station to report the relay station tosubscriber station CINR. The subscriber station replies using theMOB_SCN-REP message. At this stage, the base station knows CINR_(RS),and can estimate C_(RS) using, e.g., the modified Shannon model. Thebase station also knows C_(BR) from the MCS used when transmitting tothe relay station, so that C_(BR-RS) can also be computed.

If a handoff is necessary, the base station may notify the relay stationof an imminent subscriber station handoff. While not necessary, thisstep may improve the handoff reliability. The base station theninitiates the handoff process. In any case, when a handoff from the basestation to the relay is needed, the base station sends an instruction tothe subscriber station to use the relay. Such an instruction comprises acell ID associated with the relay station. For instance, the basestation may send an IEEE 802.16-2005 MOB_BSHO-REQ message.

New Signaling Messages

One optional 802.16j specific message need to be defined:

-   -   relay station_IMMINENTHO: to notify the relay station that the        subscriber station is about to handoff. This message is        optional.

The process is illustrated in FIG. 3 illustrating a downlink handofffrom the base station to the relay station.

Case 4: Subscriber Station Linked to Base Station, Uplink

When the subscriber station is linked to the base station on the uplink,the process to determine the optimal route is as follows:

-   -   1. The base station requests the relay station to measure and        report C_(SR).    -   2. The base station computes C_(SR-RB) as a function of at least        C_(SR) and C_(RB) and decides which link to use.    -   3. The base station compares C_(SR-RB) and C_(SB) and makes the        determination whether to use the relay station. If        C_(SR-RB)<C_(SB), END. Else go to Step 4.    -   4. The base station notifies the relay station of an imminent        subscriber station handoff.    -   5. The base station initiates subscriber station handoff to the        relay station.    -   6. The subscriber station acknowledges the handoff command.    -   7. The subscriber station ranges to the relay station.

Note that the relay station needs to report C_(SR) even though thesubscriber station is not connected with the relay station. In order toperform this step, the relay station needs to be aware of when thesubscriber station transmits. in order to enable this operation, thebase station may provide to the relay station an indication of thesubscriber station ID (Such as one of the subscriber station's CIDs) ormay provide an indication of a channel resource upon which the relay mayreceive a signal from a subscriber station in order to assist inmeasuring the link quality. A simple way to accomplish this task is forthe relay to decode the uplink_MAP that the base station sends. If thisis not possible (because the relay station uplink_MAP is sent at thesame time as the base station uplink_MAP: case of synchronizednetworks), the base station needs to indicate to the relay stationwhere/when it should expect a subscriber station uplink transmission, byusing a subscriber station_uplink_RESOURCE_REPORT. Also, the relaystation needs to be aware of the transmit power of the subscriberstation in order to perform an accurate link quality estimation. Thetransmit power of the subscriber station may be provided to the relaystation by the base station. In any case, the relay station needs tosend C_(SR) (or link quality information necessary to compute C_(SR)) tothe base station, in a solicited or an unsolicited manner. Note that thedescription of the subscriber station transmit power aspects from case 2is also applicable to case 4.

When a decision is made that the susbscriber station should connect tothe relay station, the base station notifies the subscriber station toutilize the relay station. The base station needs to provide thesubscriber station with at least a cell ID associated with the relaystation, and, in the context of the IEEE 802.16-2005 standard, can usethe MOB_BSHO-RSP message. The base station may also optionally notifythe relay station of an imminent subscriber station connection in orderto increase the robustness of the handoff process. Alternatively, theprocess may be done in a transparent manner with the subscriber stationbeing unaware of the fact that its transmissions are relayed by therelay station. For that purpose, the base station instructs the relaystation to monitor and relay transmissions from the subscriber stationwhen it is determined to utilize the relay station in forming the linkpath between the subscriber station and the base station, but does notsend any instruction to the subscriber station.

Also note that the process could be initiated by the relay stationrather than the base station, as described for the other scenarios. Forexample, the relay station can measure C_(SR) in an unsolicited fashion,and it knows C_(RB) based on the MCS it uses when transmitting to thebase station. However, the relay station does not know C_(SB). As aresult, the relay station could send C_(SR) to the base station in anunsolicited fashion if the relay station determines that C_(SR-RB) has alarge enough value (indicative that a handoff to the relay station lookspromising). Alternatively, the relay station may compare C_(SR-RB) andC_(SB) and make the determination whether to use the relay station. Inthat case, the relay station may receive C_(SB) from the base station.Once the path determination is done by the relay station, the relaystation may send a link path recommendation to the base station.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a base station 400. As shown, base station400 comprises logic circuitry 401, transmit circuitry 402, and receivecircuitry 403. Logic circuitry 401 preferably comprises a microprocessorcontroller, such as, but not limited to a Freescale PowerPCmicroprocessor. In the preferred embodiment of the present inventionlogic circuitry 401 serves as means for controlling base station 400,and as means for analyzing received message content, and means fordetermining a best uplink or downlink path between a subscriber stationand base station 400. Transmit and receive circuitry 402-403 are commoncircuitry known in the art for communication utilizing a well knownnetwork protocols, and serve as means for transmitting and receivingmessages. For example, transmitter 402 and receiver 403 are well knownIEEE 802.16 transmitters and receivers that utilize the IEEE 802.16network protocol. Other possible transmitters and receivers include, butare not limited to transceivers utilizing Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11, orHyperLAN protocols.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart showing the operation of base station 400 whendetermining a best uplink path for a subscriber station. The logic flowbegins at step 501 where logic circuitry 401 determines a link quality(C_(SR)) from the subscriber station to a relay station. As describedabove, this step preferably comprises transmitting a message viatransmitter 402 to the relay station to obtain C_(SR). In the situationwhere the subscriber station is in communication with the relay station(case 2), the base station requests the relay station to report C_(SR).In the situation where the subscriber station is in communication withthe base station (case 4), the base station requests the relay stationto measure and report C_(SR) by preferably decoding the uplink_MAP thatthe base station sends. In either case a message containing C_(SR) isreceived by receiver 403 and provided to logic circuitry 401.

At step 503, logic circuitry determines a link quality (C_(RB)) from therelay station to the base station. There are several possible ways forthe base station to determine C_(RB), (e.g., based on the MCS or MCR ordata rate used for the relay to base link, or based the SNR of the relayto base link, etc.).

At step 505, logic circuitry determines link quality (C_(SB)) from thesubscriber station to the base station. In the situation where thesubscriber station is in communication with the relay station (case 2),the BS may need to monitor a transmission from the SS in order todetermine C_(SB) based on e.g., the CINR observed on the monitoredtransmission. In the situation where the subscriber station is incommunication with the base station (case 4), the BS should already knowthe MCS/data rate/CINR etc. of the SS to BS link, and such informationcan be used for determinining C_(SB).

Once C_(SR), C_(RB), and C_(SB) are determined, the logic flow continuesto step 507 where a quality of a first link path from the subscriberstation to the base station (that passes through the relay station) isdetermined by logic circuitry 401 based on the link qualities C_(SR) andC_(RB). Next, at step 509 a quality of a second link path from thesubscriber station to the base station (that does not pass through therelay station) is determined by logic circuitry 401 based on the linkquality (C_(SB)). Finally, at step 511 a determination is made by logiccircuitry 401 whether to utilize the first link path or the second linkpath from the subscriber station to the base station based on at leastthe quality of the first and second link paths. For example, it may beadvantageous to select the second link path if C_(SB)>C_(SR-RB).

FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing operation of base station 400 whendetermining a best downlink path for a subscriber station. The logicflow begins at step 601 where logic circuitry 401 determines a linkquality (C_(RS)) from a relay station to the subscriber station. Asdescribed above, this step preferably comprises transmitting a requestmessage via transmitter 402 to the relay station to obtain C_(RS). Inthe situation where the subscriber station is in communication with therelay station (case 1), the base station requests the relay station toreport C_(RS). In the situation where the subscriber station is incommunication with the base station (case 3), the base station requeststhe subscriber station to measure and report downlink CINR of the relaystation to subscriber station link. In either case a message containingC_(RS) is received by receiver 403 and provided to logic circuitry 401.

At step 603 logic circuitry 401 determines a link quality (C_(BR)) fromthe base station to the relay station; C_(BR) is known by logiccircuitry 401 and may be based on the MCS used by the base station whentransmitting to the relay station. At step 605 logic circuitry 401determines a link quality (C_(BS)) from the base station to thesubscriber station. In the situation where the base station iscommunicating directly with the subscriber station, C_(BS) is preferablydetermined based on the MCS used by the base station to transmit to thesubscriber station. In the situation where the relay station is incommunication with the subscriber station, the base station requests therelay station to instruct the subscriber station to measure and reportdownlink CINR of the base station to subscriber station link. In thelatter case, the relay station then transmits a message to receiver 403representing directly or indirectly the link quality C_(BS).

Once C_(RS), C_(BR), and C_(BS) are determined, the logic flow continuesto step 607 where a quality of a first link path from the base stationto the subscriber station (that passes through the relay station) isdetermined by logic circuitry 401 based on the link qualities C_(RS) andC_(BR). As discussed above, the quality may comprises a data rate. Next,at step 609 a quality of a second link path from the base station to thesubscriber station (that does not pass through the relay station) isdetermined by logic circuitry 401 based on the link quality (C_(BS)).Finally, at step 611 a determination is made by logic circuitry 401whether to utilize the first link path or the second link path from thesubscriber station to the base station based on the quality of the firstand second link paths. For example, it may be advantageous to select thefirst path if C_(BR-RS)>C_(BS).

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a relay station 700. As shown, relaystation 700 comprises logic circuitry 701, transmit circuitry 702, andreceive circuitry 703. Logic circuitry 701 preferably comprises amicroprocessor controller, such as, but not limited to a FreescalePowerPC microprocessor. In the preferred embodiment of the presentinvention logic circuitry 701 serves as means for controlling relaystation 700, and as means for analyzing received message content, meansfor determining link quality, and means for generating transmit messagecontent. In some embodiments, logic circuitry may also include means fordetermining a best uplink or downlink path between a subscriber stationand a base station. Transmit and receive circuitry 702-703 are commoncircuitry known in the art for communication utilizing predeterminedprotocols, and serve as means for transmitting and receiving messages.For example, when communicating with an IEEE 802.16e subscriber station,transmitter 702 and receiver 703 use an IEEE 802.16 compliant protocol,but may use either an 802.16e protocol or a different protocol whencommunicating with another relay station or a base station. Otherpossible transmitters and receivers include, but are not limited totransceivers utilizing Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11, or HyperLAN protocols.

FIG. 8 describes the message flow from the relay perspective when asubscriber station is connected to the RS. At step 801, the relaystation transmits a message to a subscriber station to instruct thesubscriber station to measure the link quality from another transmitter,preferably the base station. In order for the subscriber station toperform this link quality measurement, the message sent to thesubscriber station by the relay station needs to indicate some form ofidentifier of the transmitter. At step 803, the relay station receives amessage from the subscriber station containing the link qualityinformation. At step 805, the relay station forms a link quality reportmessage, that may include the link quality information, and transmitsthis quality report message to the base station. Then, at step 807, ifthe base station assesses that the subscriber station should be directlyconnected to the base station, the base station sends a command to therelay station in order to direct the relay station to send the handoffcommand to the subscriber station. At step 809, the relay station sendsthe handoff command to the subscriber station in order to direct thesubscriber station to handoff to the base station.

The handoff message from the base station may also act as an implicit orexplicit indicator to the relay station that the base station willaccept a direct link path connection with the SS. In addition, in orderto improve the reliability of the handoff process, the base station maysend an acknowledgement that the base station will accept a connectionwith the subscriber station. Also, the process described in FIG. 8 canbe initiated at the relay station's request or at the base station'srequest. For the latter case, before initiating the process described inFIG. 8, the relay station receives a request from a base station for therelay station to acquire the quality.

The message flow for the base station operation is described in FIG. 9for the case when the subscriber station is connected to the basestation. At step 901, the base station sends a message to the subscriberstation to request the subscriber station to measure the link qualityfrom another transmitter (a relay station). In this message, atransmitter identifier needs to be specified. At step 903, the basestation receives a reply from the subscriber station with the linkquality information. At step 905, the base station transmits a handoffmessage to the subscriber station to instruct the subscriber station toconnect with the relay station. At step 907, the base station transmitsdata for the subscriber station to the relay station.

Other embodiments of the signaling message flows are possible. In someembodiments, the base station may receive path quality information froma relay station. In order embodiments, the base station may transmit amessage to the subscriber station through the relay station instructingthe subscriber station to connect with the base station.

The signaling message flow can also be adapted to handle transparentrelaying. For instance, the base station may receive a message form therelay station containing the link quality information for the subscriberstation to the relay station link. This message may be sent in asolicited or unsolicited manner: if solicited by the base station, thebase station sends a message to the relay instructing the relay tomeasure and report C_(SR) for a particular subscriber station. The basestation may then transmitting a message indicating whether the relaystation should relay data from the subscriber station to the basestation. For non transparent signaling, in addition to the previoussteps, the base station also needs to transmit a handoff message to thesubscriber station instructing the subscriber station to connect withthe relay station.

The previously described process can also be handled by the relaystation. In that case, the relay station transmits a message to the basestation instructing the base station to measure and report link qualityfor a subscriber station to relay station link (C_(SB)).

An additional embodiment of the invention comprises a method fordetermining a link path between a subscriber station and a base station,the method comprising the steps of: determining a link quality (C_(SR))between the subscriber station and a relay station; determining a linkquality (C_(RB)) between the relay station and the base station;determining a link quality (C_(SB)) between the subscriber station andthe base station; comparing a function of C_(SB) to a function of atleast C_(SR) and C_(RB); and determining whether utilize the relaystation in forming the link path between the subscriber station and thebase station based at least on the comparison. The last 2 steps of thismethod may also be replaced with the following three steps: Based on atleast the link qualities (Csr, Crb), determine a quality of a first linkpath between the subscriber station and the base station that passesthrough the relay station; Based on at least the link qualities (Csb),determine a quality of a second link path between the subscriber stationand the base station that does not pass through the relay station; andbased on at least the quality of the first and second link paths,determining whether to utilize the first link path or the second linkpath between the subscriber station and the base station. Determining aquality of a second link path between the subscriber station and thebase station that does not pass through the relay station based on atleast the link qualities (Csb) may comprise using Csb as the quality ofthe second link path. Also, Cxy can be related to an anticipated datarate between x and y, or to a previous data rate between x and y. Whenthe relay station is utilized in forming the link path between thesubscriber station and the base station, the link path passes throughthe relay station. Also, the determination of whether utilize the relaystation in forming the link path between the subscriber station and thebase station may be performed at the base station. When there is morethan one relay in a link path, determining a link quality (C_(RB) orothers) may include the effect of all of the relays in the path. Alsothe subscriber station, base station, and relay station may communicateon a shared radio frequency channel. Also, the step of comparing C_(SB)to a function of at least C_(SR) and C_(RB) and/or the step ofdetermining whether utilize the relay station may be performed at thebase station. Also, that the base station may provide an indication ofthe subscriber station ID to the relay station and/or a channel resourceupon which the subscriber station will transmit and/or an indication ofan expected transmit power level of the subscriber station, to assist inmeasuring the link quality. Also, the base station may receive a linkquality report from the relay station indicating C_(SR). Also, C_(RB)may be based at least in part on a modulation-coding scheme being usedfor communication between the relay station and the base station. Also,the base station may notify the subscriber station to utilize the relay,such as by providing a cell ID associated with the relay station, whichmay be done with a MOB_BSHO-REQ or similar message. Also, the basestation may notify the relay station of an imminent subscriberconnection if the base station knows that such a connection will occursoon. Also, the processing described to occur at the base station couldat least in part be carried out by the relay station. In such a case,the relay station may need to obtain at least some of the link qualityinformation from the base station, and the relay station may determine alink path recommendation and send it to the base station. Also, when adirect link path is selected between the base station and subscriberstation, the relay station may instruct the subscriber station toconnect to the base station, and send a message to notify the basestation of an imminent subscriber connection. Also, when an additionalrelay is available on a parallel link path (e.g., relay 2), a linkquality (C_(SR2)) may be determined between the subscriber station andthe second relay station, between the second relay station and the basestation (C_(RB2)), and then the determination of whether utilize therelay station in forming the link path between the subscriber stationand the base station based at least on the comparison may includecomparing the function of at least C_(SR2) and C_(RB2) to the functionof at least C_(SR) and C_(RB).

An additional embodiment of the invention comprises a method fordetermining a link path between a base station and a subscriber station,the method comprising the steps of: determining a link quality (C_(RS))between a relay station and the subscriber station; determining a linkquality (C_(BR)) between the base station and the relay station;determining a link quality (C_(BS)) between the base station and thesubscriber station; comparing C_(BS) to a function of at least C_(RS)and C_(BR); and determining whether utilize the relay station in formingthe link path between the base station and the subscriber station basedat least on the comparison. The last 2 steps of this method may also bereplaced with the following three steps: Based on at least the linkqualities (_(CRS), Cbr), determine a quality of a first link pathbetween the base station and the subscriber station that passes throughthe relay station; Based on at least the link qualities (Cbs), determinea quality of a second link path between the base station and thesubscriber station that does not pass through the relay station; andbased on at least the quality of the first and second link paths,determining whether to utilize the first link path or the second linkpath between the base station and the subscriber station. Also, whenthere is more than one relay in a link path, determining a link quality(C_(BR) or others) may include the effect of all of the relays in thepath. Also, the subscriber station, base station, and relay stationcommunicate on a shared radio frequency channel (e.g., in a TDD system).One or more of the steps may be performed at the base station or therelay station. Also, the base station may instruct the relay to requestthe subscriber station to measure and report C_(BS). The relay mayrequest that the subscriber station measure and report based onCINR/RSSI etc., such as by sending a MOB_SCN-RSP message to thesubscriber station. Also, the base station may request that that therelay station measure/report one or more of the link qualities, such asC_(BR) or C_(RS). Also, the base station may obtain the link qualityC_(RS) from the subscriber station, such as by sending a request to thesubscriber station to measure/report link quality (e.g., using aMOB_SCN-RSP message). When the path that includes the relay is selected,the base station may notify the subscriber station to utilize the relay,which may include providing a cell ID associated with the relay stationto the subscriber station (e.g., using a MOB_BSHO-REQ message), and mayalso include the base station notifying the relay station of an imminentsubscriber connection. When the selected link path is a direct pathbetween the base station and the subscriber station, the base stationmay instruct the relay to send a message to the subscriber station todirectly connect to the base station (e.g., the relay may send aMOB_BSHO-REQ message to the subscriber station). Also, one or more ofthe steps of this embodiment may be performed by the relay station. Therelay station may request the subscriber station to measure and reportC_(BS). (e.g., by sending a MOB_SCN-RSP message to the subscriberstation). Also, the base station may obtain the link quality C_(RS) fromthe subscriber station, and the base station may provide the linkquality C_(BS) to the relay station. Also, relay station may instructthe base station to request the subscriber station to measure and reportC_(BS) such as by requesting the base station to send a MOB_SCN-RSPmessage to the subscriber station. Also, the relay station may send alink path recommendation to the base station. Also, when the link pathis changing from a path that includes the relay to a path that does notinclude the relay, the relay station may instruct the subscriber stationto utilize the base station (e.g., by sending a MOB_BSHO-REQ message tothe subscriber station), and the relay station may optionally notify thebase station of an imminent subscriber station connection.

FIG. 10 illustrates communication system 1000 where an exemplary path ofmore than one relay is included in the path between the base station andthe subscriber station. In the example shown if FIG. 10 there are threehops overall between the base station and the subscriber station. Allthe algorithms previously described can be applied e.g., at the RS₁level, by having RS₁ using the signaling previously described for thebase station, RS₂ using the signaling previously described for the relaystation, and SS using the signaling previously described for thesubscriber station. FIG. 10 also illustrates that in some embodiments,the link quality between a base station, a first relay station, and asecond relay station may be considered as a single composite(end-to-end) link quality between the base station and the second relaystation.

FIG. 11 illustrates communication system 1100 where there is more thanone potential candidate relay for establishing the path between the basestation and the subscriber station. In such a situation, the basestation may evaluate the three possible paths: a) direct path betweenthe base station and the subscriber station, b) a path using RS₁ as theintermediary relay station, and c) a path using RS₂ as the intermediaryrelay. In doing the path determination, the base station needs toevaluate C_(RS1) and C_(RS2), with the signaling previously defined.Then the base station computed C_(BS-RS1) and C_(BS-RS2) and comparesthese two values with C_(BS) to determine the best path.

FIG. 12 illustrates communication system 1200 having the link qualitybetween a first relay station, second relay station and a subscriberstation optionally be considered as a single composite (end-to-end) linkquality between the first relay and the subscriber station.

Messages

Next, exemplary embodiments of messages, for some aspects the invention,for an IEEE 802.16 system are given. Although not shown, it is alsopreferred that the relay station periodically provide some or all of itsDCD and UCD information to the base station, in order to allow the basestation to convert DIUC and UIUC indices to link capacity ormodulation/coding rate values. The simplest way to provide this is forthe relay station to occasionally send its DCD and/or UCD messages tothe base station, possibly with a new wrapper or header that isspecifically designed for the relay station to base station link.

RS_CAP_DL-REQ.

This message can be sent by the BS to the RS to request that the RS

-   -   measure and report the link quality on the RS to SS link.

Syntax Size Notes RS_CAP_DL- REQ_Message_Format( ) { Management Message8 bits Type=TBD Report metric 8 bits Bitmap indicating metrics on whichthe corresponding triggers are based: Bit 0: RS to SS CINR mean Bit 1:RS to SS RSSI mean Bit 2: RS to SS DIUC Bit 3: overhead-adjusted DIUCBit 4: overhead-adjusted MCR Bits 5-7: reserved }Parameters can be as follows:

CID (in the Generic MAC Header) RS Primary Management CID.

The following parameters can be as follows for the RS_CAP_DL-REQmessage:

Report Metric

Bitmap indicator of trigger metrics that the BS requests the RS toreport.Bit 0: RS to SS CINR meanBit 1: RS to SS RSSI meanBit 2: RS to SS DIUC. This is the DIUC that the RS most recently usedwhen transmitting to the SSBit 3: overhead-adjusted DIUCBit 4: overhead-adjusted MCRBits 5-7: reserved; can be set to zero.

RS_CAP_DL-RSP.

In response to the RS_CAP_DL-REQ message, the RS can send anRS_CAP_DL-RSP.

Syntax Size Notes RS_CAP_DL- RSP_Message_Format( ) { Management Message8 bits Type=TBD Report metric 8 bits Bitmap indicating metrics on whichthe corresponding triggers are based: Bit 0: RS to SS CINR mean Bit 1:RS to SS RSSI mean Bit 2: RS to SS DIUC Bit 3: overhead-adjusted DIUCBit 4: overhead-adjusted MCR Bits 5-7: reserved If (Report metric[Bit0]==1) RS to SS CINR mean 8 bits If (Report metric[Bit 1]==1) RS to SSRSSI mean 8 bits If (Report metric[Bit 2]==1) Bit 2: RS to SS DIUC 8bits If (Report metric[Bit 3]==1) Bit 3: overhead-adjusted DIUC If(Report metric[Bit 4]==1) Bit 4: overhead-adjusted MCR }The RS_CAP_DL-RSP message can include the following parameters:

CID (in the Generic MAC Header) RS Primary Management CID.

The following parameters can be as follows for the RS_CAP_DL-RSPmessage:

Report Metric

Bitmap indicator of trigger metrics that the RS to reports.

RS to SS CINR Mean

Indicates the CINR measured by the RS from the particular SS.The value can be interpreted as a signed byte with units of 0.5 dB. Themeasurement can be performed on the subcarriers of the BS-to-RS preamblewhich are active in the particular BS s segment.

RS to SS RSSI Mean

Indicates the Received Signal Strength measured by the RS from theparticular BS.The value can be interpreted as an unsigned byte with units of 0.25 dB,such that 0x00 is interpreted as −103.75 dBm, an MS can be able toreport values in the range −103.75 dBm to −40 dBm. The measurement canbe performed on the BS-to-RS preamble.

RS to SS DIUC

Indicates the DIUC that the RS most recently used when transmitting tothe SS.Note that DIUC is equivalent to an MCS index.

Overhead-Adjusted DIUC

A DIUC value that has been compensated for overhead. Also known as “net”DIUC

Overhead-Adjusted MCR

A modulation/coding rate value that has been compensated for overhead.Also known as “net” MCR, it will have a smaller value than the MCR usedby the RS to transmit to the SS.

RS_MEAS_SS-REQ.

The BS can send this message to the RS to request it to send aMOB_SCN-RSP message to the SS in order to measure the link quality ofthe BS-to-SS link.

Syntax Size Notes RS_MEAS_SS- REQ_Message_Format( ) { Management Message8 bits Type=TBD CID 16 bits  Primary management CID of the SS Reportmetric 8 bits Bitmap indicating metrics on which the correspondingtriggers are based: Bit 0: BS CINR mean Bit 1: BS RSSI mean Bits 2-7:reserved }The parameters of the RS_MEAS_SS_REQ can be as follows:

CID

Primary management CID of the SS

Report Metric

Bitmap indicator of trigger metrics that the BS requests the SS toreport.Bit 0: BS CINR meanBit 1: BS RSSI meanBits 2-7: reserved; can be set to zero.

RS_MEAS_SS-RSP.

The RS can send this message to the BS in reply to an RS_MEAS_SS-REQ inorder to report the link quality of the BS-to-SS link.

Syntax Size Notes RS_MEAS_SS- RSP _Message_Format( ) { ManagementMessage 8 bits Type=TBD CID 16 bits  Primary management CID of the SSReport metric 8 bits Bitmap indicating metrics on which thecorresponding triggers are based: Bit 0: BS CINR mean Bit 1: BS RSSImean Bits 2-7: reserved If (Report metric[Bit 0]==1) BS CINR mean 8 bitsIf (Report metric[Bit 1]==1) BS RSSI mean 8 bits }The parameters of the RS_MEAS_SS_RSP can be as follows:

CID (in the Generic MAC Header) RS Primary Management CID. Report Metric

Bitmap indicator of trigger metrics that the RS to reports.

BS CINR Mean

The BS CINR mean parameter indicates the CINR measured by the SS fromthe particular BS.The value can be interpreted as a signed byte with units of 0.5 dB. Themeasurement can be performed on the subcarriers of the frame preamblewhich are active in the particular BS segment

BS RSSI Mean

The BS RSSI mean parameter indicates the Received Signal Strengthmeasured by the RS from the particular BS. The value can be interpretedas an unsigned byte with units of 0.25 dB, such that 0x00 is interpretedas −103.75 dBm, an MS can be able to report values in the range −103.75dBm to −40 dBm. The measurement can be performed on the frame preamble.

RS_INITIATEHO-REQ.

When the BS determines that an SS connected to one of its downstream RSshould establish a direct path with the BS, the BS can instruct the RSto send an RS_INITIATEHO-REQ:

Syntax Size Notes RS_ INITIATEHO- REQ_Message_Format( ) { ManagementMessage  8 bits Type=TBD CID 16 bits Primary management CID of the SS }

RS_INITIATEHO-RSP.

When the BS determines that an SS connected to one of its downstream RSshould establish a direct path with the BS, the BS can instruct the RSto send an RS_INITIATEHO-REQ:An RS can optionally acknowledge an RS_INITIATEHO-REQ with theRS_INITIATEHO-RSP message:

Syntax Size Notes RS_ INITIATEHO- RSP_Message_Format( ) { ManagementMessage  8 bits Type=TBD CID 16 bits Primary management CID of the SS }

RS_IMMINENTHO.

The BS may optionally send this message to notify the RS of the imminenthandoff of an SS to the RS.

Syntax Size Notes RS_ IMMINENTHO_Message_Format( ) { Management Message 8 bits Type=TBD MAC ID 48 bits MAC ID of the SS that will handoff tothe RS }

RS_CAP_UL-REQ.

This message can be sent by the BS to the RS in order to requestmeasurement of the quality of the SS to-RS link.

Syntax Size Notes RS_CAP_UL- REQ_Message_Format( ) { Management Message8 bits Type=TBD CID 16 bits  SS primary management CID Report metric 8bits Bitmap indicating metrics on which the corresponding triggers arebased: Bit 0: SS CINR mean Bit 1: SS RSSI mean Bit 2: SS UIUC Bit 3: SStransmit power Bit 4: Overhead-adjusted UIUC Bit 5: Overhead-adjustedMCR Bits 6-7: reserved }The parameters can be set as follows in the RS_CAP_UL-REQ message:

CID (in the Generic MAC Header) RS Primary Management CID. Report Metric

Bitmap indicator of trigger metrics that the BS requests the RS toreport.Bit 0: SS CINR meanBit 1: SS RSSI meanBit 2: SS UIUC. Note that UIUC is equivalent to an MCS index.Bit 3: SS transmit power

Bit 4: Overhead-adjusted UIUC Bit 5: Overhead-adjusted MCR

Syntax Size Notes RS_CAP_UL- RSP_Message_Format( ) { Management Message8 bits Type=TBD Report metric 8 bits Bitmap indicating metrics on whichthe corresponding triggers are based: Bit 0: BS CINR mean Bit 1: BS RSSImean Bit 3: SS transmit power Bit 4: Overhead-adjusted UIUC Bit 5:Overhead-adjusted MCR Bits 6-7: reserved If (Report metric[Bit 0]==1) SSCINR mean 8 bits If (Report metric[Bit 1]==1) SS RSSI mean 8 bits If(Report metric[Bit 2]==1) Bit 2: SS UIUC 8 bits If (Report metric[Bit3]==1) Bit 3: SS Transmit power If (Report metric[Bit 4]==1) Bit 4:Overhead-adjusted UIUC If (Report metric[Bit 5]==1) Bit 5:Overhead-adjusted MCR } Bits 6-7: reserved; can be set to zero.

RS_CAP_UL-RSP.

In response to the RS_CAP_UL-REQ message, the RS can send anRS_CAP_UL-RSP:The parameters can be set as follows in the RS_CAP_UL-RSP message:

CID (in the Generic MAC Header) RS Primary Management CID. Report Metric

Bitmap indicator of trigger metrics that the RS reports to the BS.Bit 0: BS CINR meanBit 1: BS RSSI meanBit 3: SS transmit power

Bit 4: Overhead-adjusted UIUC Bit 5: Overhead-adjusted MCR

Bits 6-7: reserved; can be set to zero.

SS CINR Mean

The SS CINR mean parameter indicates the CINR measured by the RS fromthe particular SS.The value can be interpreted as a signed byte with units of 0.5 dB. Themeasurement can be performed on the subcarriers that are assigned to theUL burst of the SS of interest.

BS RSSI Mean

The BS RSSI mean parameter indicates the Received Signal Strengthmeasured by the RS from the particular SS of interest. The value can beinterpreted as an unsigned byte with units of 0.25 dB, such that 0x00 isinterpreted as −103.75 dBm, and RS can be able to report values in therange −103.75 dBm to −4° dBm. The measurement can be performed on thesubcarriers that are assigned to the UL burst of the SS of interest.

SS UIUC

Indicates the UIUC that the RS most recently assigned to the SS.Note that UIUC is equivalent to an MCS index.

SS Transmit Power

Indicates the transmit power that the SS is using.

Overhead-Adjusted UIUC

A UIUC value that has been compensated for overhead. Also known as “net”UIUC

Overhead-Adjusted MCR

A modulation/coding rate value that has been compensated for overhead.Also known as “net” MCR, it will have a smaller value than the MCR usedby the SS to transmit to the RS.

RS-UL_MAP_RX-REP

To enable UL link metric estimation procedures for an SS, the RS and theBS can exchange this message to indicate the particular UL burstallocation made to the SS:

Syntax Size Notes RS-UL_MAP_RX- REP_Message_Format( ) { ManagementMessage 8 bits Type=TBD CID 16 bits  Primary management CID of the SSUIUC 4 bits OFDMA symbol offset 7 bits Length 4 bits Length of the SSuplink zone Permutation 2 bits PUSC UL_IDcell 7 bits First slot in zone10 bits  First slot of the allocation for the SS Length 10 bits  Lengthof the allocation for the SS

VARIATIONS

While the invention has been particularly shown and described withreference to a particular embodiment, it will be understood by thoseskilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be madetherein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.For example, the capacity calculation based on the MCR of the datatransmission does not include control channel overhead. If the controlchannel overhead is small, or is similar for both the relay and the basestation, then the impact on the routing decision will be nearlyinsignificant. However, if desired, the subscriber station can include acontrol channel overhead assumption in the capacity calculations. Thecontrol channel overhead assumption could be predetermined and fixedbased on the system design, or it could be determined dynamically. Thedynamic determination could be made based on monitoring the controlchannels of the base station and relay station, or the relaystation/base station could broadcast overhead factors for the subscriberstation to use.

Additionally, the link path decision may take multiple factors intoaccount, such as the traffic loading of the base station and/or relaystation, traffic que levels, anticipated future changes in link quality,and so forth.

Additionally, alternate methods based on the same principle couldutilize a capacity indicator, efficiency indicator, etc. for the basestation to relay station and relay station to base station links ratherthan MCS.

Additionally, in some cases, it may happen that a relay cannot allocateall of its resources for relaying. In this case, the relay may includethe fraction of resources that can be allocated for relaying in thesignaling messages. Or, more efficiently, the fraction of resources canbe embedded in the link quality (e.g., MCS, capacity) computation: forinstance, if the relay can allocate 50% of its resources for relaying,its link efficiency could be normalized to MCS_(RS)2 instead ofMCS_(RS). Similarly, on the uplink, when computing the SINR for thesubscriber station to relay station or subscriber station to basestation link, the subscriber station can take into account the number ofsubcarriers assigned for this particular transmission.

Additionally, while the above description was presented for a two-hoparchitecture, the extension for a higher number of hops isstraightforward. More signaling is necessary, because the capacity ofall the intermediate links is needed.

The routing decision is then preferably made based on the end-to-endcapacity computation.

Additionally, when determining a best route, other relay stations may beconsidered for routing. For example, the base station may consider asecond relay station RS2 when considering the best link path. In suchsystems, the best link would be additionally determined by determining alink quality (C_(SR2)) from the subscriber station to a second relaystation and determining a link quality (C_(RB2)) from the second relaystation to the base station. The step of determining whether utilize therelay station in forming the link path from the subscriber station tothe base station will be additionally based on comparing at leastC_(SR2) and C_(RB2) to C_(SR) and C_(RB).

It is intended that such changes and variations come within the scope ofthe following claims.

1. A base station comprising: a transmitter requesting channel qualityinformation from a subscriber and a relay; a receiver receiving anover-the-air transmission that contains channel quality information; andlogic circuitry determining a link quality (C_(SR)) from the subscriberstation to a relay station, determining a link quality (C_(RB)) from therelay station to the base station, determining a link quality (C_(SB))from the subscriber station to the base station, determining a qualityof a first link path from the subscriber station to the base stationthat passes through the relay station based on the link qualities(C_(SR), C_(RB)), determining a quality of a second link path from thesubscriber station to the base station that does not pass through therelay station based on the link quality (C_(SB)), and determiningwhether to utilize the first link path or the second link path from thesubscriber station to the base station based on at least the quality ofthe first and second link paths.
 2. The base station of claim 1 whereinthe over-the-air transmission comprises an IEEE 802.16 MOB_SCN-REPmessage containing quality information.
 3. The base station of claim 1wherein request for link quality measurements comprises an IEEE 802.16MOB_SCN-RSP message.
 4. The base station of claim 3 wherein theover-the-air transmission comprises an IEEE 802.16 MOB_SCN-REP messagecontaining quality information.
 5. A base station comprising: a receiverreceiving an over-the-air transmission that contains channel qualityinformation related to a subscriber station and a relay station; andlogic circuitry determining a link quality (C_(SR)) from the subscriberstation to a relay station, determining a link quality (C_(RB)) from therelay station to the base station, determining a link quality (C_(SB))from the subscriber station to the base station, determining a qualityof a first link path from the subscriber station to the base stationthat passes through the relay station based on the link qualities(C_(SR), C_(RB)), determining a quality of a second link path from thesubscriber station to the base station that does not pass through therelay station based on the link quality (C_(SB)), and determiningwhether to utilize the first link path or the second link path from thesubscriber station to the base station based on at least the quality ofthe first and second link paths.
 6. The base station of claim 5 whereinthe over-the-air transmission comprises an IEEE 802.16 MOB_SCN-REPmessage containing quality information.